From a gender perspective, there is the plagiarism of Defense to say. It should allow me to take this opportunity to quote myself: "If it was like really fair and effective performance (namely, the result of the work and not the verbal performance or the physical presence even after 20 clock) would count would then We have many more women higher up. " (Blog entry of 11:02:11). So with true power, this thesis had little to do. I'm not saying women are better people and would never take the intellectual property of others. But what already is noticeable is the performance with the Lord to Guttenberg runs through this whole process. For what is he doing? Apologizes and says that he will be back to be a model for other (Bundestag debate of 24.02.11). Not just kick back (as Mrs Käßmann). Why can not he afford that? Why work with his false Summa was assessed? Why does not realize that behind the appearance just put no power? I think there is here a double bias (distortion effect), which in this case was pretty driven to extremes.
know the one we want it in the evaluation of performance, unfortunately, is always bias by social characteristics. Professional assessment tries to minimize these effects. The executive, for example, have expected to perform well, because it is assumed that the person has placed it under his or her competence in so far as ("hierarchy effect"). That's true but not always, and especially not for any kind of performance. Why do people have risen hierarchically in the past, but depends on many factors, it says nothing about a particular current performance or competence. Such effects are based on stereotypes and act like horoscopes: It usually comes out here that what we want. Such effects also reinforce gender disparities, because it is well known that there are fewer women in management positions. So, women can benefit from an average of less of this effect. What is more, women always so incredibly much social competence are attributed. Stupid way these are but not necessarily leadership. For though so much buzz is made of a new so-called "feminine" management style, we all know: The desirable attributes for managers are assertiveness, decision-making and goal-oriented - characteristics that are not more female connotations. (This I will say once again this week)
Intermediate conclusion: could well be the case assessed by the (bad) performance of the Lord to Guttenberg's a gender-bound hierarchy effect played a role.
At Mr. Guttenberg had so far but may not only his leadership position and gender is important, but also his noble family. Again, if two do the same ... - It is highly valued differently. If someone is on AC / DC, the interest is usually no one. If a man rumhüpft to minister with AC / DC T-shirt, then that is extremely relaxed, because the nobles are indeed usually more buttoned up and formal. Otherwise, it is not presumptuous to say that we live in a society that is still enjoying a kind of noble-dividend. "Vons" are to be a matter the better - as a hierarchy effect in the blue-blooded robe I would call the
Otherwise I have no explanation. more like a subterranean such behavior does not mean that the minister must resign. The Chancellor has since incorrect personnel evaluation and decision, let's see if she pulls through this. Her was at this point, the book recommended Len : Fried, Andrea Wetzel, Ralf / Baitsch, Christof (2000): When two do the same thing ...: Non-discriminatory personnel appraisal. Zurich is
everyone else out of this open letter from doctoral students to the chancellor to the heart.
http://offenerbrief.posterous.com/
