Ectopic Shoulder Pain How Long Does It Last

abolish quotas immediately!

to women ratio is actually everything has already been said. We know that it is a blunt instrument at all horrible. But especially smooth it's even a "voluntary commitment" to sit out for ten years and then claim it was about time to come so "... it - unlike the men - not from one day to the required number of qualified women is available or they are simply not known. "(Former Commerzbank CEO Klaus-Peter Mueller in an interview with world-line). Sure, the leaders of tomorrow do not fall from fruit trees that are built up long term in a proper personnel policy. But that it is already ten years no female High Potential was, "Mr. Miller would have us first prove. And because of "qualifications": After the economic crisis and so a few scandals, would be to ask too, how incredible our qualified service providers must be real, to make this job well. Or what a Roland Koch they are qualified to go to the board of a construction company and its board from July to automatically be.

other hand, would ask: Why call for a quota, but if the already exist? The 100% male rate is actually already a fact on the top floors of the private sector (a few companies differ minimally from this). And I do not believe it, that the result of a relentless rate - is the talent competition - but of course totally fair. That have fought the best minds in the world of purely objective criteria established at the head of the company. Simply because: No company the world has a perfect assessment and selection procedures that will be graded entirely without prejudice. A lot of work "to know and be known-" over (to name a few mechanisms) to "stable smell" and expected forms of self-representation. The gender factor is - especially for more detailed mono-sex cultures - quite overweight (this is still good: Fried and others - see below). So the best selection, in which only the most assertive, decision strongest and most gifted to ever reach the top, is a myth for some very practical since it secures privileges. My contention, however: If it was like really fair and actual output (ie, the result of the work and not the verbal performance or the physical presence even after 20 clock) would count, then we would have many more women higher up.

is interesting but in the present debate, that also look more and more men with these gender mechanisms and for no other reason to be advocates of women's quota. For example, Michael Domsch, professor at the Bundeswehr University in Hamburg (SZ, 2.5.2011, jobs and careers). Or the elaborate version of the marketing professors John Becker, the so proposes a similar method in the field of emission quotas (SZ, business section, 02/10/2011). Since then traded alive with quota certificates like the stock market and has the advantage that the issue of representation of women and men is not that bad ", therefore comes as a political issue but a management issue and therefore more bearable for some manager. (Disadvantage: I can already hear the evil tongues of "(board) in women" speak ...).

They are after all proposals scream of people who do not like the word equality hysterical "feminism" (or think). Equality as a great democratic good to see and do not mean that Article 3 of the Basic Law would only politics and quotas on what would be acceptable only for the wimp-range of public service. The especially knowing that more or less subtle forms of favoritism and discrimination based on sex or the other (in an assessment times now irrelevant) factors leads to mediocrity. Exactly what we need in the top position (the sex of these individuals is then perhaps not so important)

So first of all.: Abolish the existing quota! That means: Much better methods of performance assessment and the selection of managers install! At the same time: Good job far better themselves people who take equal opportunities seriously! If that is regulated, we do not need any more women's quota. In the meantime, it is feared, crude forms of regulation are essential.

reading:

Fried, Andrea Wetzel, Ralf / Baitsch, Christof (2000): When two do the same thing ...: Non-discriminatory personnel appraisal. Zurich.

source of the quotation:

http://www.welt.de/wirtschaft/article8096241/Auch-die-Frauen-muessen-ihren-Beitrag-leisten.html

PS: exchange of blows in the Bundestag, said: http://www.bundestag.de/dokumente/textarchiv/2011/33571165_kw08_de_frauenquote/index.html